“Scandal: Sex and politics don’t mix when you’re a dame” by Samantha Power

/ Mike Siek

If we had a choice, our sexual histories would remain our own, the mistakes and that adventurous, experimental phase. Sexual partners would keep to themselves those private moments of exposed vulnerability. Unfortunately we sometimes don’t have a choice, especially if you happen to become a public figure. Your history is a matter of debate, another forum to learn of your moral choices and perhaps predict how you’ll lead society, based on your wardrobe choice in college.

Democratic candidate for Congress in Virginia, Krystal Ball (who admits her father made an ill-advised choice in naming her) had to confront that past when Republican opponents pulled from her Internet-documented history a few photos of Ball in a scantily clad situation. Dressed as a sexy Santa with her husband, a dildo-adorned reindeer, Ball knew what she was dealing with. “They wanted to make me feel like a whore,” Ball would write later, as a response to her accusers. In Ball’s case there was no instance of infidelity, as her husband was a full participant, no indiscretions involving young pages or interns, simply a photo at a party in her youth.

At the age of 28 Ball was one of the younger candidates, but also one of the more promising. She was listed in Forbes magazine as one of the top 25 most powerful women in the midterm elections and was endorsed by the Women Under Forty Political Action Committee. But qualifications could not save her from overt photos of her sexual history. After losing the election to Republican Rob Wittman, Ball wrote a response published in the Huffington Post, stating, “Society has to accept that women of my generation have sexual lives that are going to leak into the public sphere.”

But there is a reluctance to accept women as both sexual and political actors. A paper undertaken by Dr Melissa Miller, a political science professor at Bowling Green State University, examines the treatment of Hillary Clinton in the Democratic nomination against her male counterparts. While Clinton managed to overcome the traditional problems women face in entering public office—not enough media coverage and having most coverage focus on appearance—Clinton’s problem was rooted in the view that women should not take on too many masculine traits, that they should be viewed as feminine, despite applying for a job traditionally rooted in masculine traits.

Miller’s study examined the traits upon which Americans choose presidential candidates, two of which revolve around their masculinity, both their dominance masculinity (attitude and leadership abilities) and their expertise masculinity (technical experience). Clinton outperformed her nearest competitor, Obama, by nearly double. But for Clinton it was a drawback. Many viewed her as cold, calculating and “scary.” Her performance as a former first lady—creating strong policy choices—was viewed as “lacking characteristics of femininity,” a perception that dogged her throughout the presidential campaign.

In the game of politics, being a decisive, strong woman is unacceptable, and to have a sexual life constitutes a greater transgression. “People still have a perception of female politicans being caregivers,” says Carmen Gustafson, a former town councillor in Golden, BC. “We still talk about what they wear, [and] that gets more press time than what they think, so it shocks people and they get uncomfortable with images of women not as caregivers and not as soft creatures.”

Continue reading essay and comments here at Vue Magazine.

Samantha Power is the News Editor and writer at Edmonton’s weekly Vue Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s